Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal AgroParisTech Université Paris-Saclay UVSQ ANSES CNRS ENVA

Home page

Polyandry or monoandry ?

@ Tristan Kistler
What are the consequences on genetic evolution of an Apis melifera bee population undergoing selection?

Facing the loss of meliferous bee colonies, beekeepers are becoming more and more interested in genetic improvement to increase productivity and rusticity of their colonies. The biological particularities of the domestic bee polyandry and haplo-diploïdy) and the complexity of economically important apiculture traits (expressed by thousand of wxorkers and their queen within a colony) makes the development of efficient selection plans difficult in comparison with classical wild species. The impact of polyandry on the evolution of cross-breeding and conony performances was evaluated using stochastic simulation.

The efficacity of a selection program is based on many parameters depending in part on the biological constraints of the species and the means available to the breeder. Approximately ten days after emerging, the young queens leave their colonies to mate during several mating flights with 12 to 16 haploid drones. She then stores the sperm collected for the rest of her life. To control reproduction, the queens and drones are isolated in mating stations or artificial insemination is practiced. This method makes monoandry possible by insemination with ony one male. The drones, since they are haploid, produce identical gametes and the colonies produced are genetically homogenous. By modeling the individual genetic values of the queens, drones, groups of workers and complex phenotypes that result at the colony's scale, we explored the effects of monoandry vs polyandry on the evolution of performances and inbreeding. Two selection strategies were considered (mass vs maternal within-family selection) along with other diverse genetic parameters, notably the genetic correlation between direct effects (effect of workers) and maternal effects (effect of the queen on the colony's performance). The results show that a selection program that would use insemination on only one male for 20 years would increase inbreeding rate by 50% as compared to a polyandry scheme without significantly improving performances. In fact, monoandry favors the genetic improvement of direct effects to the detriment of maternal effects.

Contact :

  • Tristan Kistler (tristan.kistler@inrae.fr)
  • Florence Phocas (florence.phocas@inrae.fr)

See also

Reference:
Kistler, T., Basso, B., & Phocas, F. (2021). A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance. Genetics Selection Evolution, 53(1), 1-16.