Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal

Home page

Overall evaluation of pig production systems and their optimisation on the farm level

INRA Prod.Anim. 21(4), 367-386

M. BONNEAU ¹, J.-Y. DOURMAD ¹, B. LEBRET¹, M.-C. MEUNIER-SALAÜN ¹, S. ESPAGNOL ², Y. SALAÜN ², P. LETERME ³, H. VAN DER WERF ³

1INRA, UMR 1079 Systèmes d’Elevage, Nutrition Animale et Humaine, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France

2IFIP Institut du Porc, F-35651 Le Rheu, France

3INRA, UMR 1069 Sol, Agro-hydrosystèmes, Spatialisation, F-35042 Rennes, France

Abstract 

This paper summarises the contributions made by the « Porcherie verte » programme in the overall integrated evaluation of pig production systems, considering on different scales the different pertinent aspects of sustainability, beyond environmental impact. The multiple criteria comparison of two types of breeding management considers all the aspects of sustainability (environment, society, economy) but at a level restrained to pig breeding. Pigs raised on litter with access to a small courtyard have better welfare, better growth performances but with fatter carcasses than pigs raised on wood slats. Their meat has a poorer technological quality but a better sensorial quality. This type of management produces less unpleasant odours but is more costly. The products can, however, be better valorised by a label.

Modelling aimed at optimisation of a farm considers the environmental and economic aspects, but not those of society, when comparing the different ways to manage waste. The scale of the approach is larger than in the preceding study, considering the interactions between animal and plant production on the farm’s property, which corresponds to a fundamental decision scale in agriculture. The « raw manure » waste management leads to an improved gross margin, with good environmental balance, but the production is limited to 60 pigs per hectare. The biological treatment of manure without phase separation allows increasing pig production but deteriorates the phosphorus balance of the farm and significantly reduces the gross margin per pig produced. Phase separation before biological treatment of manure allows an increased pig production that respects environmental phosphorus constraints, but it decreases the gross margin per pig produced. Manure composting can be an alternative to biological treatment for small farms, but its environmental balance is poor. Exporting manure compost slightly improves the apparent N and P balances of the farms but does not change gas emissions. It allows maintaining good gross emissions, even with high numbers of animals. Pig breeding on litter allows the production of more pigs/ha but is unfavourable for the environmental impact and increases production costs. Composting litter manure increases pig production per ha but only in the absence of environmental constraints on phosphorus and the growth of the gross margin is low. Exporting the compost surplus allows increasing pig production by lowering the apparent N and P balances, but not gas emissions. Biological treatment seems to give the best compromise between gross margin and environmental impact amongst the different types of treatment that allow a large number of animals, as long as one does not consider the impact of transfers outside of the farm. Amongst the different types of treatment with exportation that allow very high population levels, the composting of manure seems to cumulate the disadvantages in terms of gross margin and environmental impacts, if one neglects the impact of transfers outside of the farm associated with biological treatment.

The global evaluation of environmental impact of pig farms is restrained to the environmental aspects but its scale of approach integrates all the impacts associated with the processes upstream of the farm. The analysis of the life cycle (ACV) is a method of choice to do this evaluation and was developed for the comparison of the environmental impacts of the three contrasted scenarios of pig production. The most intensive production according to the scenario of good agricultural practices has the lowest impact on climate change, but the highest impact on acidification. Biological production that is not intensive uses a large surface but has a lower impact on eutrophisation.

Download documents