Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free:

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site:, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Google Analytics

Targeted advertising cookies


The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at or by post at:

24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo TULIP Nouveau bandeau tutelles EN


Our ability to predict adaptation evolution is very limited in natural populations

Our ability to predict adaptation evolution is very limited in natural populations
Although there are many examples of contemporary natural selection, evidence for responses to selection corresponding to predictions is often lacking in wild populations. Resulting from scientific discussions between researchers from several laboratories including 3 TULIP labs (EDB - UMR 5174 CNRS/UPS/IRD, LIPM UMR 2594/441 CNRS/INRA and SETE UMR 5321 CNRS/UPS), this Trends in Ecology & Evolution article explores the combined effects of mechanisms that can accelerate or constrain the response to natural selection.

Our ability to predict adaptation trends is very limited in natural populations. Although we can efficiently predict adaptation to the selection of populations under highly controlled conditions, such as in breeding, researchers note a general lack of response to selection in wild populations. Despite the high diversity of natural populations and the existence of selection pressures, the response to selection does not appear to occur as expected.

This result may be explained by the fact that several mechanisms are acting at different levels of interaction (biotic, abiotic, etc ...), and that collectively may prevent the response to selection. Among the mechanisms identified are:

  • Phenotypic plasticity
  • Genetic correlations (correlation among genes that are thus selected jointly)
  • Parental effects
  • Fluctuating selection (the direction of selection of survivors vary with environmental conditions, which maintains diversity because selections can pull to different optimum at different times and places)

But two aspects still remain to be taken into account, the authors of the article say. First, these mechanisms are often acting simultaneously while we study them separately, thus ignoring the consequences of the accumulation and interactions. The second element is the existence of other mechanisms that still are not taken into account to date: non-genetic inheritance, co-evolution or demography.

In natural populations, as all mechanisms may be acting in different directions, it is not so surprising that selection is weaker than expected. This may drastically diminish the efficiency of each mechanism of selection in natural populations, thus allowing the maintenance of diversity, which can then be remobilized after the arousal of new environmental conditions.

« It is by integrating all these mechanisms at all levels that we will be able to correct our predictions of evolution, and that we will be able to explain why diversity is maintained. It is only at this cost that we will begin to get a more realistic picture of what happens in natural populations, and why they respond or do not respond to selection pressures. » concludes Benoit Pujol.

See also

Benoit Pujol et al. The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild. Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2018).