Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal ENVA anses

UMR BIPAR Biologie Moléculaire et Immunologie Parasitaire

News

1. HCERES evaluation

Monday February 18th, 2019

2. UMR annual general meeting

Thursday November 29th, 2018

3. Scientific advance: Press release from BIPAR JRU: 21/09/2018

Why tick bites induce red meat allergy in humans?

Ticks transmit pathogens that cause important human diseases, like Lyme disease. Tick bites, however, can also cause red meat allergy, known as Alpha-gal syndrome. Unlike most food allergies, in which symptoms occur within minutes of consuming the allergen, allergic reactions related to the Alpha-gal syndrome are delayed. The symptoms can appear four to six hours after a meal containing red meat. The first report of the association between tick bites and red meat allergy was in 2007 when the Australian allergist Professor Sheryl van Nunen described 24 cases of meat allergy associated with tick bites. Later in 2009, Professor Thomas Platts-Mills identified the molecule causing these severe allergic reactions. Patients allergic to red meat, Platts-Mills discovered, had allergic antibodies to a complex sugar called galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose, or alpha-gal for short. Currently, it is generally accepted that ticks that cause Alpha-gal syndrome carry alpha-gal molecules from the blood of the animals they commonly bite, such as cows, sheep and rabbits. It is then believed that when an alpha-gal-charged tick bites a human, the tick injects alpha-gal into the person inducing allergic antibodies. This implies that tick larvae that never fed before cannot induce the Alpha-gal syndrome. This accepted wisdom was challenged by Dr. Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz and his colleagues of the UMR BIPAR (Anses, EnvA, INRA), located in the Laboratory for Animal Health of Anses (Maisons-Alfort) and Spain  who asked whether ticks were able to produce their own alpha-gal. In a manuscript published in the journal Scientific Reports (https://rdcu.be/7mlF), Cabezas-Cruz reported the discovery of three tick genes encoding for galactosyltransferase enzymes that can produce alpha-gal. When human and bacterial cells that do not produce alpha-gal where transformed with these genes, these alpha-gal-negative cells became alpha-gal positive. In addition, when these genes were knockdown using RNA interference, the levels of tick alpha-gal decreased. The researchers further showed that the tick-borne bacteria, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, induce the expression of one of these genes, which resulted in the increase of tick alpha-gal. This study has two main implications. Firstly, it shows that ticks do not need to feed on any animal to carry alpha-gal. Therefore, the bite of any tick stage, including larvae, can induce Alpha-gal syndrome. Secondly, tick infected by the bacteria Anaplasma phagocytophilum may have higher levels of alpha-gal increasing the probability of inducing Alpha-gal syndrome. This influences our current way of thinking about tick-pathogen interactions since according to these results, the consequences of microbial infection of ticks are not only related to transmission of pathogens to animals and/or humans, but also to the increased ability that infected ticks may have to induce alpha-gal syndrome in humans.